The New York Times (1/29, Jensen) reports that a study from the Highway Loss Data Institute shows that bans on cellphone use “haven’t reduced crashes” in some states, and the result “had the researchers scratching their heads.” The study, finished in December, compared all crashes in California, New York, Connecticut and Washington with crashes after bans were instituted, and researchers “can’t even see a blip in the data.” One possible explanation is “that while cellphones are a distraction, maybe they are not ‘all that much worse a distraction than many of the other things that we do,’” institute president Adrian Lund said. Alternately, the data may mean “drivers in places with these bans may be switching to hands-free phones,” and crash risks are “about the same as with handset phones.”
The Washington Post adds that in the capital, the study showed that a ban on cellphone use “hasn’t made the streets much safer.” The Post also notes the lack of effect from hands-free cellphones, and points out that “the larger issue of distracted driving has gained traction” with the finding that the practice does not reduce accidents. The Post adds, “The report is the latest in a growing body of evidence cited by those who advocate banning all cellphone use by drivers,” and it points out that the National Safety Council “called last year for a ban on cellphone use while driving.”
The Wall Street Journal also reports the story, noting that the study conclusions come as regulators are also focused on the practice of texting by both regular and commercial drivers.
Source: American Association for Justice
Ms. Filutowski has a track record of recovering over $3.0 million dollars for her clients through negotiations, arbitrations, mediations and trial.
